Photography Freedom

Everyone loves to take photographs of some kind. While some folks picture photographs of particular events, others have a hobby of taking photos of nature and other structures they like. Some people even make a great career in Food Photography Northampton. In fact, many photographers make a huge sum through photography. Certain photographers specialise in wedding photography. On the other hand, many photographers make a good career in wild life photography. However, this freedom to take photos is now under attack. As a result, there is a heated debate why taking photos should not be allowed.

Learn more about Food Photography Northampton

Arguments in favor of ban on taking photos

In recent times, terrorist groups have targeted public places for suicide attacks and bombings. To carry out their attacks, a couple of individuals from the terror group take photos of places that have immense traffic. These folks plan out their attacks in view of videos and photos taken on public areas. On the basis of data received through pictures, terrorists conduct their activities with utmost precision.

The lives of people at public places are at stake on account of serial bombings and suicide attacks. Many terror groups also carry out activities of riots and vandalism and destroy public properties in addition to injuring people at large. To combat terrorism, certain countries have come up with the draft of banning photo picturing in public places.

Arguments in favor of freedom to take photos

Although the arguments in favor of banning photography in public areas seem to be correct apparently, it has many loopholes. First of all, terrorists can also carry out bomb blasts and suicidal attacks without taking photos. Some people have such a sharp memory that they can visualise whatever they have seen at a particular place. If these folks join a terror group, they can provide an easy road-map for riots or terror attacks at any place. Also, there have been incidents of riots, bombings and vandalism even when photography was not much developed.

Above all, you just can't take the freedom of people to capture pictures and photos of their preferences. Many people make a living by selling photos. The earnings of such people are also at stake. As such, it is unfair on the part of nations to ban photography. It would be a better idea that people and authorities collaborate with each other and exchange information of sensitive nature. In this way, the freedom of taking photos will be restored and the act of terrorism could be minimized.

Bottom line

Taking pictures of public property and natural surroundings is a birth right. No one can impose ban on freedom to tap pictures in public areas. However, there are instances when pictures of public areas have been used for targeting people and creating terror. Still, people can't be banned for picturing photos just because one of them might be a terrorist. It is the duty of the authorities of respective places to safeguard the property of that area. People should also exercise diligence and inform the authorities if they detect any suspicious person taking photographs. With collective efforts, the freedom to take pictures and photographs will thrive without any hindrance.